Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and a fine of ten million won, Defendant B’s imprisonment with prison labor of ten months and fine of seven million won, and Defendant C.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] Defendant A received a summary order of KRW 5 million from the Seoul Western District Court on July 16, 2012 for a crime of violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts such as Intermediating, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts (or brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts). Defendant B was sentenced to a fine of KRW 4.5 million from the Seoul Central District Court on October 10, 2016 for a crime of violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts such as Arranging, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts (or brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts), and Defendant C was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 5 million from the Seoul Southern District Court on August 30, 2012.

[Criminal facts]

1. The joint crimes B by Defendant A and Defendant C (the fine of KRW 4.5 million, October 10, 2016, and October 18, 2016) are persons who operated sexual traffic establishments under the trade name “H” from January 10, 2016 to July 6, 2016, and Defendant A was a person who worked as the head of the office at the said establishments, and Defendant C was a person who served as the head of the office at the weekend.

The Defendants, along with the business owner B, advertised the above business at the Internet site, including “J” from January 10, 2016 to July 6, 2016 (Provided, That from June 25, 2016 to June 26, 2016, from July 2, 2016 to July 3, 2016), Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Itel 319, 618, 107, 1218, 1518, 1618, and 2218, the Defendants were waiting to advertise male customers, such as “K,” etc., who reported the advertisement, and announced them to the said officetel.

D, L and other women engaged in sexual intercourse similar to male customers.

As a result, Defendants conspired with B to engage in commercial sex acts such as arranging sexual traffic.

2. Defendant A, Defendant D, and Defendant B’s joint criminal acts constituted a person who operated a sexual traffic establishment under the trade name of “H” from July 11, 2016 to July 19, 2016, and Defendant D was a person who worked at the said establishment as the head of office and was subject to an investigation as the head of the police station at the time of police control, and Defendant B was to act as the head of the office.

Defendants are also the Defendants on March 2016.