logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.03.24 2016고단8418
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months and by a fine not exceeding 8,00,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. “C” or “D” is a person who has operated a sexual traffic business establishment under the trade name of “C” or “D,” and the Defendant and F are those who have worked as the head of the said sexual traffic business establishment.

From June 20, 2015 to December 2015, the Defendant, along with E and F, advertised the above trade names on the Internet sites, such as “H” and “I,” and advertised the above trade names, and reported the advertisement, and directed the above officetels in which women, such as J, etc., are waiting to engage in sexual intercourses or similar sexual intercourses with male customers, after receiving a delivery of KRW 150,00 to KRW 300,00 from male customers, who were waiting to engage in sexual intercourses, from around June 20, 2015.

Accordingly, the defendant conspireds with E and F for business purposes to arrange sexual traffic.

2. A person who has operated a sexual traffic business establishment with the trade name called "K", and the defendant is a person who has worked for the above sexual traffic business establishment as the head of office.

On June 16, 2016, from around July 20, 2016 to around July 20, 2016, the Defendant advertised businesses with the above trade names on the Internet sites, such as “N”, “I”, etc., of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office Mtel 247 and 406, and advertised them to report and contact the advertisement. The Defendant received the delivery of KRW 1.60,00 to KRW 170,00 from male customers, and directed them to the said officetels where women are waiting for commercial sex acts, such as Q and R, and led them to sexual intercourse with male customers.

Accordingly, the defendant conspireds with L to engage in commercial sex acts such as arranging sexual traffic.

3. The broker E in a sexual traffic business establishment is a person who has operated a sexual traffic business establishment in the trade name of “S”, and the Defendant and T are those who have worked in the above sexual traffic business establishment as the head of office.

The Defendant together with E and T from August 15, 2016 to August 22, 2016.

arrow