A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 13, 2015, the Defendant: (a) reported on the front of the Guro-si C Apartment House guard room in the Gumi-si, Si, Si.S. on the road, and reported that “the principal jur fesssing a vision while crossinging the road; (b) the slope belonging to the D District of the Gu, the Gu, U.S. Police Station D District, and the Inspector F, who called to the site, carried the Defendant into the ethro of the said slope E by issuing a police scamer and returning home, and by his hand, having the Defendant look back of the said slope E with the defect, and “I am scam. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. am., and again am, after drinking the left part of the said slope E’s slope.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of public peace and order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of E and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes attached to internal investigation reports, photographs, copies of work logs in the D District, and detailed statements of handling 112 reported cases;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (see, e.g., Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution) (see, e.g., Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution where a person committed a crime under the custody of a person in a flagrant offense and committed an act of his or her usual behavior after his or her death), which appears to have been aware of the fact that he or she committed an act of his or her usual behavior;