The part of the judgment of the court below regarding the acceptance of bribe among the guilty part and the acquitted part shall be reversed.

Defendant .

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

Defendant: misunderstanding of facts, misunderstanding of legal principles as to the part of passengers exceeding the number of passengers on board, misunderstanding of facts, and misunderstanding of facts as follows, the lower court convicted the Defendant of this part of the charges without considering the following points. In other words, the chief of the flight management office in charge: (i) the Defendant’s operation management office is only one of the safe navigation of coastal passenger ships and is not the final decision-making authority; and (ii) there was no intention to interfere with the business of the Defendant; (iii) the Defendant’s act does not constitute a deceptive scheme (or there was no other party in the site). ④ The Defendant ordered the Defendant to clearly stop departure from port; (iv) reported that it was excessive to the chief of the traffic police station Q, a superior institution, and there was evident evidence and circumstances that the Defendant did not issue an order to leave port; (iii) the Defendant did not receive a temporary inspection from the lower court without being misunderstanding of the legal principles as to the number of passengers on board the port; and (iv) the Defendant did not receive a temporary inspection from the 25th passenger vessel under the Ship Safety Act.

3) The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (six months of imprisonment).