logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.09.08 2016고단4298
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A and B Imprisonment for one year, Defendant C and D for each of 8 months, Defendant E for a fine of KRW 1,00,000, and Defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On July 14, 2016, Defendant D was sentenced to imprisonment for four months and one year of suspended execution for violating the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. at the Seoul Northern District Court (Seoul Northern District Court), and the said judgment became final and conclusive on the 22th of the same month.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Defendant B, Defendant A, and Defendant D’s co-principal from May 2015, with 30% shares in K and the same business from around May 15, 2015, operated the L of Suwon-si L and M as “M” in subparagraph 202, and Defendant A was bound by K as a crime of violating the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. around July 27, 2015, Defendant A had 70% shares in lieu of K and operated the said business jointly with Defendant B, and Defendant D had worked as an employee of the said business from around May 15, 2016.

around June 21, 2016, the Defendants conspired with the aforementioned M to employ 3-6 female employees engaged in sexual traffic, by having them engage in sexual intercourse with 120,000 won and having the F, female employees engaged in sexual traffic engage in sexual intercourse. Defendant B, from August 27, 2015 to June 21, 2016, Defendant A, from January 28, 2016 to June 21, 2016, Defendant D, from May 15, 2016 to June 201, Defendant D, from May 2016 to June 20, 2016, in collusion with Defendant D to arrange sexual intercourse with Defendant D, and Defendant B, from May 20, 2016 to June 20, and Defendant B, Defendant D and Defendant C, in collusion with Defendant D, to offer sexual intercourse.

2. Defendant C was subject to the control from September 4, 2015 on suspicion that Defendant C operated the above M around the beginning of September 2015 to the police as a broker for sexual traffic, but Defendant C was subject to the control on charges of engaging in sexual traffic brokerage business to the police on September 4, 2015. Defendant C asked Defendant C to receive punishment instead of receiving punishment.

arrow