logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구고등법원 2019.06.27 2018나23644
공사대금
Text

1. Among the ancillary claims for the judgment of the court of first instance, the design of the type of concrete structure related to the construction of the structure of the first and second water works in this case.

Reasons

1. Recognizing the basis for the convenience of preparing the judgment on the basis of facts, first, express the specific scope of the inquiry by this Court.

A. On May 29, 2012, the Defendant: (a) announced a long-term long-term long-term contract construction work in the total bid for the “E” (hereinafter “instant construction work”); (b) and (c) was selected as a construction work by the Plaintiff at the bid.

B. On June 18, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for construction works between the Defendant and the instant construction works (hereinafter “instant primary construction works”). As to the contract amount, KRW 87,585,840, total construction amount, KRW 4,584,854,100, construction period, and KRW 4,584,854,100, from June 22, 2012 to April 21, 2013 (from the commencement date of construction, KRW 304, total 1,460, June 2016) and the total date of completion.

On the other hand, the Plaintiff and the Defendant included the general terms of the construction contract as part of the terms and conditions of the construction contract at the time of concluding the construction contract.

C. Since a long-term continuing construction contract, a contract for construction works was concluded several times after a long-term continuing construction contract, and the contract was finally changed to the total construction cost of KRW 5,284,400,000 and the final completion date of construction on March 19, 2017. The details of the specific changes are as listed below.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant construction contract” collectively referred to as both the contract and the modified contract. The grounds for the amendment of each modified contract are as indicated in the grounds for the amendment of the contract attached Table 2.

On June 18, 2012.6. 87,585,840,584,85,100 on June 22, 2012. 87,585,585,8404, 937,790,790, 2000 on June 22, 2012. 87,587,5840 on June 21, 2013; 2013. 83. 6. 2, 2013; 4. 4. 4. 7; 4. 5. 6. 2, 2013; 4. 4. 8. 6. 1, 205; 4. 4. 6. 1, 2013; 4. 4. 4. 4. 7. 7. 1, 2014;

arrow