Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On November 28, 2017, around 16:00, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the property damage case against the above court No. 2017 and 1853, at the court of 318, 163 U.S. Soon-ro 163, U.S. Soon-ro, Incheon.

Defendant (C) testified “N” to the attorney’s question, “I do not have any witness to this other vehicle’s street,” and Defendant (C) was on the part of this vehicle.

“I’t give testimony to the questions of the Attorney-at-law,” and “I’n no contact with the Defendant (C) for this vehicle.”

The question of “C” by the attorney-at-law is not to bring this vehicle to drinking, but to examine the vehicle bat by hand.

“The testimony was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, on May 21, 2017, in fact, C ceased to stop in front of the FK7 passenger car owned by E, which is being driven by the Defendant, and damaged the repair cost to be equivalent to KRW 750,286 by cutting off the said vehicle with a drinking car, while disputing the Defendant on the front side of Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, Incheon, and the Defendant was able to do so.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect C by the police;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. E statements;

1. A report on internal investigation, a written estimate attached to a report on investigation, a report on investigation (a statement attached to a report on 112 case and a record of recording);

1. Each protocol of examination of the witness and each recording book (the defendant and his defense counsel merely testified as the defendant made a testimony and did not make a false testimony contrary to the memory of the defendant;

The argument is asserted.

According to the record of the Defendant’s testimony in this Court case No. 2017 and 1853, the Defendant’s testimony was examined as follows: “C E is driving the vehicle in front of the vehicle and in hand.”