The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In fact, the court below recognized the defendant's crime of injury and damage to property only once the victim was pushed, and there was no fact of causing injury to the victim, and even though there was no fact of causing damage to the World Cup, the court below erred by misunderstanding of facts.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (fine 1.5 million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination:

A. According to the records on the assertion of mistake of facts, the victim and G have consistently stated the fact of damage (G) from the investigative agency to the court of original trial, and in particular, the victim took the place at the court of original instance, "I would like to leave the place, and I would like to put the witness at the time," and "I would like to put the witness in the future," and "I would like to go back to the front of the witness, and I would like to go back to the bridge, and I would like to come up to the side, and I would like to come up with the victim's name, and I would like to come up in the office of the victim, and I would like to come up with "I would like to come up to go out of the office of the victim," and I would like to come up with "I would like to come up to go out of the office of the victim," and I would like to come up with "I would like to go out of the office of the victim."