The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal was only a dispute with F, and there was no violence against I and G, and the police officers L and W did not directly witness the situation at the time but testified with F that the Defendant used violence.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous and adversely affected by the judgment.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, namely, F, at the court of the lower court, found the place of witness by two male and female members including the Defendant at the time.

피고인이 증인에게 ‘ 야가 이 새끼가 H 동생이 네 ’라고 하면서 증인의 뺨을 때렸고, 남자가 증인의 팔을 꺾고 목을 졸랐으며, 피고인이 발로 증인의 머리를 찼고, 다른 여자가 옆구리 등을 수회 찼다.

” 는 취지로 진술한 점, ② I은 원심 법정에서, “ 여자들이 G의 머리채를 잡고 남자가 주먹과 발로 G의 얼굴, 가슴 등을 폭행하는 장면을 목격하여 증인이 다가가자, 남자들이 증인에게 ‘ 이 자슥도 똑같은 놈들이다 ’라고 하면서 증인의 멱살을 잡고 주먹과 발로 증인의 허벅지, 허리 등 전신을 수회 폭행을 했다.

During that process, the Defendant said that “in Korea” is “K Earra,” and was blicking with the witness.

“The statement to the effect that “” was stated in the court of the court below, ③ at the court of the court of the court below, G: “Many woman was shaking of a witness’s hair, the face, chest, etc. of a witness due to drinking and fry, and thereby, he left the bones and nose.

“The statement to the effect that “” was stated, ④ The diagnosis report for the injury that the above victims received at the hospital after the instant case was issued, ② “F” was “I,” and “I, hump, hump, hump, hump, hump, hump, hump, hump, hump, hump.