logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.09.27 2017고단1544
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 4,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 14, 2017, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two months for 4 months, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 22, 2017, due to a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as the Mediation of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (or brokerage, etc. for commercial sex acts) in support for the preparation of a place of guard and the

The Defendant is a person who has three smuggling with approximately 150 square meters in Sii-si E and 3 floors, and operates a sexual traffic business establishment with the trade name of “F”.

On November 8, 2016, the Defendant, at the above F around 22:20 on November 22, 2016, installed three smuggling equipped with shower rooms, 3 studio 4 studio, 2 waiting rooms for female employees, 8 CCTV which photographs outside the business place, and employed Thailand’s nationality G, etc. as a woman of sexual traffic, and followed sexual traffic.

In the same manner from October 12, 2016 to November 8, 2016, 2010, a slope H, who was a crackdown police officer, received KRW 110,00 as the price for sexual traffic, and directed him as a smuggling, sent the above G to arrange sexual traffic, and arranged sexual traffic.

2. Defendant B is a person who has three smugglings with approximately 150 square meters in E and 3 stories in Silung-si, and operates a commercial sex trafficking business establishment, namely, “F”.

On February 20, 2017, around 21:15, the Defendant, at the above F on February 20, 2017, installed three smuggling equipped with shower rooms, 3 studio 4 studio, 2 waiting rooms for female employees, 8 CCTVs shooting outside the business place, and employed I et al. as a female of sexual traffic and engaged in sexual traffic.

The Police Officer, who was in charge of enforcement police officers, received KRW 110,00 as the price for sexual traffic and directed him as the smuggling, and arranged sexual traffic by sending it to the above I as well as arranging sexual traffic by the same method from February 5, 2017 to February 20, 2017.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A written statement prepared in the I;

1. Spatial photographs of each field control;

1. Before judgment: The inquiry of summary information of Defendant A (the date of confirmation) and the application of the text of the judgment of the court below No. 489 (the date of confirmation) and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the court below No. 489

1. Defendants: the pertinent legal provisions and the choice of punishment regarding criminal facts.

arrow