logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2019.10.02 2019고단1018
전기통신사업법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one may intermediate a third party's communications using telecommunications services provided by a telecommunications business operator, or provide such services for a third party's communications.

Nevertheless, at around 17:58 on November 14, 2018, the Defendant: (a) was aware of the Defendant’s residence in Daegu-gun District Court building B, which opened a mobile phone at a cost; and (b) was aware of the Defendant’s “on-hand-on-hand-hand-on-hand-hand-hand-on-hand-hand-on-hand-hand-on-hand-hand-on-hand-hand-on-hand-hand-hand-on-hand-hand-on-hand-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-

Accordingly, the defendant provided telecommunications services provided by telecommunications business operators for the purpose of telecommunications in collusion with the above person.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The document of F;

1. A report on investigation (the sequence 4 in list of evidence);

1. G account;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of conversation content;

1. Article 97 Subparag. 7 and Article 30 of the Telecommunications Business Act regarding criminal facts, the choice of fines (the nature of the crime in this case is unlimited, but the defendant is led to confession and reflect, the profit gained from the crime in this case is not significant, the primary crime, and other circumstances shown in the arguments in this case);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow