The judgment of the first instance court, including the plaintiff's claim expanded and reduced in this court, is modified as follows.

Basic Facts

A. On May 26, 2014, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in D Hospital (hereinafter “D Hospital”) on May 26, 2014 due to symptoms that are difficult to satisfy the right satisfying and right satisfying down, and was diagnosed on the catum catum for nuclear escape (refisfying) and was diagnosed on the catum satisfys at the above hospital on May 28, 2014.

(B) (hereinafter “First Operation”). On July 22, 2014, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital, and received from Defendant C, a doctor affiliated with the Defendant Hospital, the following: (a) on August 1, 2014, 1: (b) the vertebrate sofaculation, the escape certificate of the 45 protruding signboards, and the 1,000 post-defaculation symptoms; and (c) the 45th and the 1,000 confaculation of post-defaculation (hereinafter “Second operation”).

From the second surgery, the Plaintiff continued to be honding symptoms due to the decline in the sense of right and the weakening of influence after the second surgery. As a result of the court of first instance’s physical appraisal commission, the Plaintiff appeared to have a pain, satisfy, satfy, refry, and walk-out disability even until July 2018, which was at the time of appraisal. This was assessed as permanent disability (40% of the labor capacity loss rate) according to the opinion that the symptoms are fixed for four years after the occurrence of the event.

[Ground of recognition] A without dispute; Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, 7, 8, 11 through 16; Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including paper numbers); Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including paper numbers); the result of the first instance court’s entrustment of medical records to the E Hospital Head; the result of the commission of physical examination to the director of Busan University Hospital; the purport of

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

(a) When a relevant legal doctor performs medical acts, such as diagnosis, treatment, etc., he/she has a duty of care to take the best measures required to prevent any danger depending on the patient's specific symptoms or circumstances, considering the nature of the duty to manage human life and body, and such duty of care shall be the level of medical acts performed in the field of clinical medicine, such as