A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 19, 2014, from around May 18:00 to around May 18:00, the Defendant: (a) received the request from “D Game Center” located on the third floor of building C in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “D Game Center”) which is the owner of the business; (b) and (c) received the request from “E (i.e., one year and six months imprisonment on September 17, 2015, and (ii) in the appellate court trial; and (b) made E’s efforts to assist customers in exchanging the outcome obtained as a result of the game in cash in order to assist them, the Defendant provided the game room with the services, such as handling of the customers who face a disturbance in the game room (hereinafter “personal customers”), and blocking all of the games at the time of the end of the business, thereby facilitating the relevant crime.

2. On August 27, 2015, the Defendant was present and taken an oath as a witness of the “case of Violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry against Defendant E” in the Ulsan District Court Decision 303, Ulsan District Court on August 27, 2015, and testified following the Defendant’s testimony, “Defendant E does not refer to the question of counsel’s duty to authorize the head of the D Game.”

Then, the proprietor of the D Game funeral is the defendant F, "I will be asked for the questions of the counsel "."

The testimony was made to the effect that E is unrelated to the operation of the game site.

In fact, E and F had been living together and operated an illegal game room described in paragraph (1) above on the ground of F. However, Defendant 1 knew that E was the owner of the business of the above D game room due to the fact that E and other illegal game room work was attempted as above.

After all, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the prosecution against E;

1. Protocols of examination of witnesses;

1. Photographs, text of judgment, and telephone conversations of the defendant;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 152(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 152(1)2 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry, Article 44(1)7 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry, Article 32(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 32(1) of the Criminal Act (a) of the same Act, and Article 152 of the same Act on the selection of punishment for a crime, and Article 152(1) of the same Act on the selection of a sentence,