logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.03.03 2017고정10
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반방조
Text

The sentence against the accused shall be determined by a fine of two million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

B is an operator of the “D Game Center” located in Seo-gu, Seoan-gu, 201 (hereinafter “instant Game Center”). The Defendant, as an employee of the head of the instant game center, was in charge of cleaning the game site, customer care, etc.

No one shall distribute or use game products different from the contents of the rating, and shall exchange the tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of the game products.

The defendant from around 09:00 on July 16, 2015 to the same year.

8. From 19:20 until 30. 30. The game of this case, unlike the contents of the rating for the game machine “B”, where a specific manipulation was made differently from the contents of the rating for the game machine “B”, the 40 game machine, which was modified to automatically proceed without any operational ability of the game users, such as changing the score of the trokeing nine level, provided customers’ access to the game, deducts 10% of commission and exchange the score acquired through the game, thereby allowing customers to engage in gambling and other speculative acts using the game water, which is an employee in charge of cleaning the game room and the customer’s heart.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on the examination of each police suspect with respect to B, E, F, G, and H;

1. Scenic photographs;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on game explanation, replys as a result of appraisal, B and A's telephone details;

1. Article 44 (1) 1 and Article 28 of the Act on the Promotion of Alternative Game Industry, Article 32 (1) of the Criminal Act (referring to aiding and abetting the use of game products), Article 44 (1) 2 and Article 32 (1) 7 of the Game Industry Promotion Act, Article 32 (1) of the Criminal Act (referring to aiding and abetting the exchange of game result), Article 45 subparagraph 4 and Article 32 (1) 2 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry, Article 32 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 32 (1) of the Criminal Act (referring to aiding and abetting the use of game products in violation of the rating classification), Article 32 (1) of the Criminal Act (referring to aiding and abetting the provision of game products in violation of the rating classification), Article 32 of the Criminal Act

1. Article 32(2) and Article 55(1) of the Criminal Act for mitigation of assistance.

arrow