1. All claims filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the counterclaim claims by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) are dismissed.

2. Of the costs of lawsuit.

A principal lawsuit shall also be deemed a principal lawsuit.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a person who operates the website called “C” (hereinafter “C”), and the Defendant is a person who operates the Internet camera (hereinafter “D”) following the portal site.

B. On July 5, 2015, the Defendant posted a notice to the effect that “C Accusations.” under the title “C,” “C mediates and operates a commercial sex acts site and a tezine site, directly manufactures and distributes and sells tezines, and operates a commercial sex acts destination business.” It is classified into a harmful site, which is cut off from the search, and is expected to be closed and subject to criminal punishment during the investigation conducted by the competent police station.”

② On the same day, the NAV sent a reply to the question of “Isson’s punishment in arranging the C sexual traffic site and operating the obscenity site”, stating that “Isperson who will be punished shall accept the closure and detention of the site, and will be punished by law, such as arranging for a long period of illegal sexual traffic sites and operating the Mazo’s site.”

(3) The same month.

5. Does

6. “C Accusation” as an e-mail of D operator sent the notice as set forth in paragraph (1) to the members by e-mail.

(4) The same month.

8. The term “C has demanded attendance at normal level at the public notice bulletin board” and “the law is hot.” The term posted a sign stating “C is a harmful site in which the arrangement of commercial sex acts, the sale and the production, and the distribution and sale of illegal sites directly,” as the title “C has to observe.”

⑤ On the 26th day of the same month, the next statement was made on the statement that “Chyman’s advertisement was classified as the principal revenue source, the operation and direct production and marketing company, and the harmful site was classified as a harmful site, and the site was closed and detained.”

(hereinafter collectively referred to as “the timely content of this case”). (b)

The plaintiff, around November 2015, written by the defendant.