logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.02.01 2016나7695
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On February 5, 2015, the Defendant puts down a title “D” on the bulletin board “E” as follows for the following carpets (hereinafter “instant carpets”) for the preparation of a teacher appointment test: (a) on February 5, 2015, the Defendant puts down a title “E” with the following contents:

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant notice”). The low-sicker Board is composed of women.

Nr. Nr. Fr. Nr. F.nam's major in English has access for the purpose of not less than the master book but more than the master book.

Magran Magman's Status Magman's Magman's Opinion

쇠鹬도요

B. 1) The Plaintiff filed a complaint against the Defendant on the charge of violating the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection (Defamation) by posting the instant notice on the instant car page, and filed a complaint against the Defendant on the charge of violating the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection (Seoul Central District Prosecutors’ Office 2015 type No. 28072), but on July 28, 2015, the Plaintiff rendered a non-prosecution disposition on the ground that it is difficult to deem that the Defendant spreads false facts or that there was a purpose to defame the Plaintiff. 2) Furthermore, the Plaintiff filed a complaint against the Defendant on the charge of insulting the Plaintiff by posting the instant notice on the instant car page (No. 2015 type No. 197477 of the Jeonju District Prosecutors’ Office 2015 type No. 19747), and on October 27, 2015, the expression “Down-ro” was insufficient to readily conclude the Plaintiff’s personality as an expression due to lack of evidence.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 11, and 12, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. The main point of the cause of the claim is that the Plaintiff damaged the Plaintiff’s honor by posting the instant notice on the car page and expressing false facts, thereby damaging the Plaintiff’s reputation. Therefore, the Plaintiff damages KRW 7,00,000.

arrow