A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

"2014 Highest 558"

1. On May 19, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim C who reported and contacted the notice stating that he/she would sell merchandise coupons to a department store by accessing the Internet site NAV (www.naver.com) by accessing the Internet site in the middle and high-ro camera, and selling merchandise coupons, using a computer, and then reported the notice to the victim C who reported and contacted the notice to the effect that he/she would sell merchandise coupons in total at KRW 9.10,00 won of merchandise coupons 10,000,000,000 won. Accordingly, if the sales proceeds are transferred, he/she would immediately send merchandise coupons to the department store as a registration.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not hold at all the department stores, and was thought to consume the money received from the victim as a cost of living, so even if he receives sales proceeds from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the department stores.

The Defendant, at around 15:21 on the same day, received KRW 9.10,00 from the victim to the bank account (Account Number D) in the name of the Defendant, and concluded that from around that time to July 11, 201, the Defendant would sell merchandise coupons, stones, etc. as shown in the attached crime list from around that time, and received a total of KRW 17.10,000 from each victims on five occasions.

Accordingly, the defendant was informed of the victims and received property.

"2014 Highest 665"

2. On May 2, 2014, the Defendant written a notice to the effect that “I am to sell a counter-site” by accessing the Internet website NAVVER and selling a counter-site,” and that “I am to sell three half-yearlys to 495,000 won to the victim E who contacted with the above notice.”

However, the defendant did not have a reflect on the sale of the victim, and even if he received the amount of damage from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the reflect.

Nevertheless, there is a need to do so.