1. All appeals by the plaintiffs and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The expenses for appeal and the expenses for participation shall be borne individually by each person;

3...

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is by the main sentence of

2. Each of the “292,417,690 won” in the 7th sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed to be “292,417,670 won”.

The 6th sentence of the first instance judgment "1,000,000 won" is deemed "3,00,000 won".

Article 3-2(2) of the first instance judgment is as follows. 2) Since the 36,265,00 won of the cost of newly purchasing the 36,00 won of the 36,265,00 won of the 36,00 won of the 7,14,17 of the 17 of the 1999, the plaintiffs asserted that the 3-2-2 of the 3-2 of the 1999 were unable to use the 3-2 of the 292,417,670 won of the 292,670 won of the 1999, the 204,600 won of the 1999, the 204,6750 won of the 1999, the 204,606165 of the 1999, the damages amount of the 204,61606,76067 won of the 1999.

) Since the Plaintiff is a person to deduct (the Plaintiff stated to the effect that the full amount of KRW 149,176,165, which was received from L through the application for amendment of the claim of May 16, 2018 is deducted, it is in accordance with the Defendant’s limitation of liability.