1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited this case is to add evidence Nos. 8 to 12 (including paper numbers) submitted by the plaintiffs in this court as insufficient evidence, and excluding the following dismissal part, it is to accept it as it is by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since it is identical to the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance.

2. Parts in height:

2. The plaintiffs asserted that the agreement in this case was null and void since they were the plaintiff A incompetent at the time of the agreement in this case. Accordingly, the defendant is obligated to pay damages to the plaintiffs due to the death of the deceased as follows.

- Real Income of the Deceased: 194,535,086 won for lost earnings of the Deceased until the end of operation (60 years of age): 30,00,000 won for the Deceased; 15,000,000 won for the Deceased; 30,000 won for the Plaintiff A; 10,000,000 won for each Plaintiff; 149,721,051 won for the Plaintiff: 132,721,051 won [132,721,05,051 won [224,535,086 won for the deceased’s loss (224,530,000,000 won) 】 3/5,000 won for the Plaintiff’s inherited portion [3/5,000 won for the Plaintiff’s inheritance] 50,700,720,304,305,309,304,305,394, 2005

A. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows.

B. The fifth to thirteen parallels in the judgment of the first instance are as follows.

Rather, the following circumstances acknowledged that the above macroscopic evidence showed the purport of the entire pleadings, namely, ① the amount of damages requested by M and his/her spouse at the time of the agreement of this case to the adjuster, ② the plaintiff A directly participated in the agreement of this case with a certificate of seal impression and attached it to the agreement of this case (No. 3-1).