All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence of the lower court, which sentenced the imprisonment for life, is too heavy in consideration of the fact that the Defendant did not kill the victims as a result of an contingent murder, but is in depth and reflects his mistake.

B. As long as the Defendant was sentenced to 12 years of imprisonment with prison labor for murder and was released from prison, the Defendant committed extremely anti-social and non-human crimes, such as killing two victims and abandoning the body of two victims, etc., a statutory maximum penalty of death should be sentenced.

2. The Defendant: (a) tried to kill the victim’s head due to the victim E and the settlement of profits; and (b) abandoned the victim’s body in child birth.

In addition, the Defendant killed the victim F and the cash problem at a stroke.

On March 15, 2002, the Daejeon High Court sentenced the Defendant to 12 years of imprisonment with prison labor on March 15, 2002 and completed the execution of punishment on May 27, 2013, the Defendant murdered E for only one year and six months, and murdered CF.

Furthermore, after killing E for a long time, the Defendant pretended to live E by using the mobile phone of E to send text messages to his or her family members or people, and received considerable amount of money from his or her family members, and after killing F, sent text messages to the author in his or her name.

E pretended as murdering F.

In light of these points, it is doubtful whether the defendant is able to influence the life of a person and whether the defendant has a well-known mind, as well as whether he has a well-known mind.

In addition, the bereaved family members of the victims appeal the serious mental damage, and they are often punished by the defendant.