A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final.

Punishment of the crime

1. 폭행 피고인은 2019. 2. 21. 01:50경 인천 미추홀구 B에 있는 C노래연습장 앞길에서 위 노래연습장에 손님으로 온 피해자 D(57세)이 건물입구 문을 열고 나오자 피해자에게 “너나 알아 씹할새끼야 문 닫으라고”라는 욕설을 하고 주먹으로 피해자의 얼굴 부위를 2회 때리고 넘어진 피해자의 배 부위를 발로 수회 걷어찼다.

The Defendant committed violence against the victim as above.

2. 공무집행방해 피고인은 2019. 2. 21. 02:00경 제1항 기재 C노래연습장 앞길에서, 112신고를 받고 출동한 인천미추홀경찰서 E파출소 소속 경찰관 F, G로부터 폭행죄의 현행범인으로 체포됨을 고지받자 손바닥으로 위 F의 왼쪽 뺨 부위를 1회 때리고 발로 위 F의 왼쪽 허벅지 부위를 1회 걷어차고 이를 제지하는 위 G의 낭심 부위를 발로 수회 걷어찼다.

As such, the Defendant assaulted F and G police officers, thereby obstructing police officers from performing their legitimate duties concerning criminal investigation and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. Investigation report and telephone communications for reference;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (field status, etc.);

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution is that the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties is an offense detrimental to the function of the State by nullifying the legitimate exercise of public authority.

In light of its attitude, the quality of the obstruction of performance of official duties is also poor.

Victims of assault D want to be punished by the defendant.

However, it shows that the defendant's confession and mistake are divided.