1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. Acknowledgement and conclusion of the first instance judgment

A. Based on the litigation materials and arguments submitted to the appellate court citing the judgment of the court of first instance, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (such as law, precedents, interpretation and application of legal principles, recognition of facts and facts requiring proof, and determination of issues) is sufficiently reasonable.

The reasoning of this Court concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for filling, cutting, or deleting the same as stated in Paragraph 2 below. Thus, this Court cited the summary as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. If so, the Plaintiff’s claim for the remainder of the purchase price pursuant to the instant sales contract against Defendant C and D is as follows.

Since the reason is reasonable within the range recognized by the certificate of qualification, it shall be accepted, and the remaining claims shall be dismissed as there is no reason.

The Plaintiff’s tort liability against the Defendants and the remainder of the purchase price under the above sales contract against Defendant E shall be dismissed in entirety as there is no reasonable ground.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed as it is without merit.

2. Supplementary argument of the judgment of the court of first instance

(a) Part 9 of the supplement to the case shall be added following the seventh day of the supplement:

8) The Plaintiff purchased each of the instant lands by Defendant C, D, and E was to relocate Defendant E’s household factory, and the fact that Defendant E, in fact, was to say that he would be adequate to transfer his household factory on each of the instant lands. As a result, Defendant E participated in the preparation of the articles of incorporation and acquired the said company’s shares as the promoter’s promoter’s promoter to become the parent company of the primary welfare corporation, and was directly involved in the process of the establishment of the welfare corporation, such as taking office as the above company director.