A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 30, 2014, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Busan District Court on December 30, 201, and a summary order of KRW 2 million for the same crime at the same court on July 11, 2016.

1. Around 20:50 on March 8, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (the U.S. measure after the accident) driven B car at the speed of B car rental cars at the speed from the intersection to the intersection of the shock to the intersection of the intersection.

At that time, there is a central separation cost in plastics, so in such a case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to live well the front and left, and to accurately operate the steering and brakes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and got the central separation unit installed in the front section of the said car by negligence, which was conducted as it was, and went about about 10 meters, so that the central separation is separated from the road or the fixed pin is separated from the road.

Accordingly, the Defendant did not take any measures to ensure that the central separation unit managed by the headquarters of Busan District Office is equivalent to 1,320,000 won for repair due to the above occupational negligence and escaped.

2. On March 8, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven the said car rental car from the gravel storage parking lot located in the Southern-dong of Busan, which was under the influence of alcohol of 0.107% on blood around 21:50 on March 8, 2017, to the roads front of the point of transmitting Busan, Seo-gu Busan, Busan, the level of which was about 5km from the gravel storage parking lot located in the Southern-dong of Busan to the point of transmitting Busan, Seo-dong.

Accordingly, the Defendant once driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again with a person who has violated the prohibition on drinking more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The actual investigation report on traffic accidents;

1. A report on the detection of a primary driver and a report on the circumstances of the primary driver;

1. The primary accident;