A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 19, 2017, the Defendant, at around 02:40, driven a BM7 car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.218% in the direction of the road located in the waterside park located in the CY-dong, Busan, through a consensus in the same Dong and the road located in front of the waterside apartment site located in the same Dong. In the direction of the waterside, the Defendant driven a BM7 car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.218% in the direction of the road located in the CY-gu, Busan, Daegu, for about 5km.

2. On June 19, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (e.g., post-accident) (e., the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol as indicated in paragraph (1) around 02:40, and continued to proceed in order with three vehicles parked on the road in front of the Busan Suwon-gu C, Busan, while driving the said car in the order of priority, which led to a consensus in the same Dong and a passage along three-lanes in front of the west apartment door at the intersection of the intersection.

At the time, there are nights, and there are places of separation in the center, so the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to operate the steering gear and brake in a safe manner by accurately manipulating the steering gear and brakes by making the operation of the driver of the vehicle a good living at the front and right-hand traffic situation.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was negligent in not operating the steering gear properly, and the Defendant was negligent by failing to operate the steering gear, and the central separation zone managed by the Suwon-gu Office, which is set up on the left-hand side of the Defendant’s running direction, as the front part of the said car.

Ultimately, even if the Defendant destroyed the central separation unit to cover KRW 1,518,000 by occupational negligence as above, the Defendant escaped without immediately stopping and checking the degree of damage.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A traffic accident report (1.2), vehicle on the scene of the accident, photo of the driver at the main place of the accident, report on the circumstances of the driver at the main place of the accident, pictures of the vehicle and stboard, reports on the occurrence of the traffic accident, estimates, investigation reports (Attachment to vehicle black stuffs and video CDs);