A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On June 15, 2009, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) from the Daegu District Court Port Branch on the part of the Defendant, and on December 1, 2008, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving).

[Criminal facts]

1. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving service of BST6 automobiles.

On November 1, 2018, 05:39, the Defendant driven the said car with a alcohol level of 0.260%, while under the influence of alcohol during blood, and led to a two-lane road in front of the D upper point in North-gu, North Korea at the port of port along one lane from the north-gu, north-gu.

Since there is a center of separation, in such a case, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle according to the way of driving.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was divided into the left-hand part of the Defendant’s car by failing to operate the steering system properly.

Ultimately, the Defendant, at the time of the above occupational negligence, escaped without taking necessary measures, such as destroying the central separation unit, which is the ownership of the north-gu Office, at the time of the victim’s port, and checking the degree of damage, and neglecting non-products.

2. On August 11, 2018, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at around 05:39, the Defendant driven BM6 car at the distance of about 5 km from the roads near the Young River Beach, which is located in the north-gu two east-gu at the port of one to the roads front of the D store located in the same Gu C, under the influence of alcohol level of 0.260% during blood transfusion.

Accordingly, the defendant, who violated the prohibition of drinking at least twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of the above provision.

Summary of Evidence

1..