1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

A. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning the instant case is next to the judgment of the first instance.

The decision of the court of first instance is the same as that of the decision of the court of first instance, except for the revision as stated in the following paragraph and addition of the decision in the trial as stated in paragraph (2).

B. (1) Subsequent to the revision of the second sentence of the judgment of the first instance court, the name of “the Plaintiff or F, regardless of the time when it was changed” was added. (2) The name of “the Plaintiff or F,” under the third sentence of the judgment of the first instance court, i.e., the “Plaintiff, etc.” under the third sentence of the judgment of the first instance, i.e., the “Plaintiffs, etc.” under the third sentence of the first instance judgment, i.e., “A 1 through 5,” and 11 of the same part, i.e., “the reason that the Plaintiff was pointed out in the instant audit,” and ii of the same part, i.e., “the reason that it was forced by the pressure or coercion of the private school audit team of the

3) Article 16-17 of the judgment of the court of first instance provides that “A public official, either intentionally or by negligence, made an illegal request for investigation of the instant case as above, and a public official made an illegal act by intention or negligence, such as making a request for investigation of the instant case on the basis of the wrong audit result of the instant audit. A public official made a request for investigation of the instant case on the basis of the wrong audit result, and committed an unlawful act by intention or negligence, such as inducing or forcing the Plaintiff not to pay rent to the Plaintiff.”

5) On November 14, 2005, the first instance court's decision 2007Da3650 decided "the first instance court's decision 2007Da3650 decided "the second instance court's decision 2007Da3650 decided November 2005" is "the second instance court's decision 2007Da3650 decided November 6).