1.The judgment of the first instance, including a claim modified at the trial, shall be modified as follows:

The defendant.

1. The court's explanation of this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for dismissal or addition as set forth below 2, and thus, it shall accept it in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Part that is dismissed or added is that “C, etc. representing five other (hereinafter “C, etc.”)” under Section 9 of the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed to read “C, etc. and five other (hereinafter “C, etc.”).

The third part of the judgment of the first instance court is that "the registration of transfer of ownership has been completed in the name of "C, etc." was completed in the name of G, U, and U, and U has completed the registration of transfer of ownership in the future of H, etc. concerning S and T forest among the real estate of this case."

After the judgment of the court of first instance, the third part of the 20th part of the 20th part of the 3rd part of the 1st part of the 201st part of the 201st part of the 201st part of the 201st part of the 201st part of the 1st part of the 201st part of the 1st part of the 201st part of the 1st part of the 15th part of the 15th part of the 15th part of the 201st part of the 1st part of the 1st part of the 201st part of the 1st part of the 201st part of the 1st part of the

Each “L” of the 4th and 6th of the judgment of the first instance court shall be referred to as “D”.

The first instance court held that the “the instant collateral security” (hereinafter “instant collateral security”) was “the instant collateral security” (hereinafter “instant collateral security”) and the “the instant collateral security” in accordance with the first collateral security (hereinafter “instant collateral security”) and the “the instant collateral security registration” in accordance with the first collateral security (hereinafter “instant collateral security”) were different from the “the instant collateral security”).

Of the table of “Agreement” at the fourth bottom of the judgment of the court of first instance, the Plaintiff and the Defendant considered “in relation to the first sale contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendant” as “in relation to the first sale contract between C, etc.”.

Judgment of the first instance.