1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

A. The reasons why the court should explain the cited part of this case are as follows.

The decision of the first instance is identical to that of the first instance court, except for the revision of the judgment of the first instance and the addition of the judgment in the second instance as referred to in the following paragraph 2, and it is also quoted by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

B. 1) The amendment of the first instance court’s 3th 4th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th

3) According to the first instance court’s decision Nos. 14 and 15, “A vertical mobile temporary bridge in which it is impossible to conclude the rear of the safety bell” was added to “the fact that it is possible to prevent a person from entering into the rear of the safety bell.” 4) The fourth part of the first instance court’s decision No. 17, “the fact that it is possible to prevent a person from entering into the rear of the safety bell.” In addition, even in a case where a person uses a well-known camera, the fact that it is possible to prevent a person from falling into either vaddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd

5) On the other hand, the first instance court’s second sentence’s “the instant accident” added “the entry of the evidence No. 1” to “190,201 won,” which is “190,201 won (be less than won, hereinafter the same)” of the third sentence. Thus, the second sentence of the first instance judgment is deemed to be “190,201 won.”