Text
1. The Defendants shall within the scope of the property inherited from the network E, and Defendant B shall be KRW 857,142, and the remainder.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On December 11, 2013, the Plaintiff requested Jeju District Court 2014 Gohap8 (hereinafter “Plaintiff criminal case”) that was prosecuted by the Plaintiff for a violation of the Public Official Election Act (hereinafter “the Plaintiff’s criminal case”). On December 12, 2013, the Plaintiff paid KRW 10 million as remuneration for the handling of delegated affairs, KRW 10 million on December 18, 2013, and KRW 30 million on February 11, 2014.
B. When the Plaintiff’s criminal case was prosecuted on January 14, 2014, and a duplicate of the indictment was served on January 20, 2014, the Deceased submitted his/her written opinion (written reply / normal relation statement) to the Plaintiff on January 27, 2014, and on February 14, 2014, the Plaintiff appeared on the first day of the trial and completed the examination of evidence by requesting the Plaintiff to submit a record of evidence favorable to the Plaintiff. In all, the Plaintiff appeared on the first day of February 14, 2014 and did not have any intention of election campaign in light of the circumstances of the case or the purpose of the front and rear context.
The deceased submitted the examination to the Defendant’s newspaper procedure and started the examination. The deceased started and started the examination more than two minutes, and the presiding judge of the Plaintiff’s criminal case proposed that the proceedings of the Defendant will proceed on the next day after the full bench’s next trial by proposing that the proceedings of the Defendant will proceed on the following day for the reasons of the circumstances such as the fact that the presiding judge of the Plaintiff’s criminal case took part in the recording as evidentiary documents requested by the Deceased as the Jeju Arbitration Department, and the replacement of the full bench.
C. Upon the occurrence of cancer, the Deceased’s failure to attend the court on March 13, 2014, which was the second trial date of the Plaintiff’s criminal case, the Deceased applied for the change of the trial date without notifying the Plaintiff on March 5, 2014.