1. The defendant shall, within the scope of the property inherited from the deceased C, attach the attached Form to the plaintiff (appointed party) and the appointed party.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the designated parties (hereinafter “Plaintiff, etc.”) concluded a contract to install and operate vending machines (hereinafter “each of the instant contracts”) with the network C engaged in the sales and consignment management of the coffee machine in their trade name (hereinafter “the network”) as shown in the attached list, stating that “if the Plaintiff, etc. purchases the vending machine from the deceased, he/she shall manage the said vending machine and pay monthly profits to the Plaintiff, etc.” (hereinafter “each of the instant contracts”).

B. Meanwhile, as indicated in the attached Table 2 List, part of the Plaintiff et al. agreed that the scope of principal to be returned by the deceased et al. under each contract of this case shall be the remainder of the amount calculated by deducting 50 million won per depreciation cost from the scope of principal to be returned by the

(Provided, however, I agreed to receive the remainder of the principal after deducting 1 million won per 10 million won as the deceased and depreciation costs.

On January 15, 2013, the Deceased established HA and continued to conduct the above business in the name of the said company.

In fact, the Deceased sold the self-reader to investors in excess of approximately 1,800 places, and operated the business using so-called “fluoring” method, such as paying other investors’ profits with the purchase price newly received as above, although the self-reader’s management was merely about 1,800 places. From April 2014, the Deceased came into a position where it is no longer possible to operate the business, such as the Plaintiff’s failure to pay profits under each contract of this case.

In such circumstances, the deceased shall be given the same damage.

5. 8. suicide.

E. On August 14, 2014, the Defendant, the only inheritor after the deceased’s death, was subject to a qualified acceptance trial by the Seoul Family Court Decision 2014Ra30455.

【Ground for recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, entry of Gap's 1 to 31, the purport of whole pleading

2. Determination on the claim of the plaintiff et al.

A. The Plaintiff et al. asserted from April 201 to May 201 of the same year.