The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant did not have established a gambling house for the purpose of profit-making, and there is no fact that he detained the victim.

B. The sentence of an unreasonable sentencing (2 million won of fine) by the lower court is too heavy.

2. Determination

가. 사실오인 주장에 대하여 1) 도박개장의 점에 관하여 원심이 적법하게 채택조사한 증거들에 의하면 인정되는 다음과 같은 점을 고려할 때 피고인이 영리의 목적으로 도박장을 개설하였다고 충분히 평가할 수 있다. 가) 피고인은 경찰에서는 F로부터 도박할 장소를 제공하면 하룻밤에 20만 원을 준다는 제안을 받고 자신의 집에서 도박을 할 수 있게 사람을 맞추어 보라고 하였더니 F가 L 등 사람을 맞추어 와서 도박을 하였고 도박을 하다가 돈을 잃은 사람이 돈을 빌려달라고 하면 빌려주는 경우도 있다고 진술하였다.

B) The Defendant’s house was kept in a single brush brush, etc. for visitors to gambling and gambling. The Defendant’s house was placed in a ward for gambling, and the participants were provided with convenience to drink or coffee. 2) The Defendant’s act of confinement in the crime of confinement refers to an act of restricting physical freedom by preventing a person from getting out of a certain place. The method includes not only physical and tangible obstacles but also psychological and intangible obstacles (see Supreme Court Order 91Mo5, Dec. 30, 1991). Considering the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court, it is sufficiently recognized that the Defendant detained the victim as stated in the judgment of the lower court. At the time of the instant case, the Defendant’s act of confinement was resolved by 200,000,000 won by taking account of the following circumstances.