beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On July 25, 2007, the defendant was notified of a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Gwangju District Court's net support on November 21, 2007. On November 21, 2007, the defendant was notified of a summary order of KRW 3 million due to a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving). On July 9, 2010, the same court was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 6 months for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 years for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act on July 17, 2010 and was punished five times.
【Criminal Facts】
1. Around 20:50 on July 6, 2012, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act and the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) driving, the Defendant did not obtain a driver’s license in front of a cafeteria cafeteria located in a dominion in a dominion city at the time of influence and driven a C high-speed vehicle with approximately two meters of alcohol content while under the influence of alcohol by at least 0.122%.
2. When the Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), was engaged in drinking, driving without a license, as above, and when he controlled to F, the Defendant was under the suspension of the execution of the same kind of crime, and thus, was sentenced to a heavy punishment. As such, the Defendant was willing to engage in driving as if he was pro-friendly G. The Defendant’s column for the driver’s statement, the driver’s statement, the driver’s statement, the driver’s statement, the driver’s statement, and the letter of confirmation on blood sampling and the letter of confirmation on blood collection presented by the above police officers, and forged the Defendant’s name on the part of the driver’s statement, the driver’s statement, the driver’s statement, and the letter of confirmation on blood collection, and submitted to the above police officers without knowledge of the forged fact.
Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of exercising a certificate of fact, forgees the report on the state of the driver, the report on the state of the driver, the report on the state of the driver, the measurement of drinking, and the confirmation on blood collection.