A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 04:10 on August 28, 2013, the Defendant driven a Chump motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of at least 0.18% in a section of about 400 meters from the front day of the Pshnb C and the front road in the same Sinbb-dong from the front day of the Pshnb-dong, which is located in the same Sinb-dong.

2. At the time set forth in paragraph (1), the Defendant: (a) was asked by the police officer affiliated with the above police box to enter the Defendant’s name in each driver or confirmation column in relation to the crackdown on drunk driving as set forth in paragraph (1); (b) when the Defendant was asked by the police officer affiliated with the above police box to enter the Defendant’s name in each driver or confirmation column in relation to the crackdown on drunk driving as set forth in paragraph (1); (c) the Defendant was likely to have been multiple times in other criminal cases; (d) had the Defendant sign the Defendant’s name in the Defendant’s pro-friendly type D name on the concern that the Defendant might have been multiple times in other criminal cases; and (e) had the Defendant written “D” in each driver column of the above alcohol detection report and the statement on the circumstances of the drinking driver; and (e) stated “D” in the column of the confirmationer of the above alcohol measurement and blood collection notification confirmation certificate; and (e) sealed the Defendant’s name next to it.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising a certificate of fact, the Defendant forged each one of the report on the detection of the driver, the report on the circumstantial statement of the driver, the measurement of alcohol, and the confirmation on blood collection in D name, which is a private document related to the certification of fact.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in Paragraph 2, exercised the instant investigation document as if he/she duly formed one copy of the falsified driver detection report, the statement of the circumstances of the drinking driver, the measurement of drinking, and the notice of blood collection, as stated in Paragraph 2, to the police officer in charge of the said pair-wing box, who is aware of the forgery.

Summary of Evidence

Defendant’s legal statement, report on detection of a host driver under D’s name, and a host driver.