The Defendants are not guilty.

1. The summary of the facts charged in this case is that Defendant A is the director in charge of driving and delivering the E tank glass vehicle from Company B, and Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) is a corporation established for the purpose of selling petroleum on August 22, 2016.

A. Defendant A (1) on May 17, 2017, at the site of “G National Highway Construction Works” located in Yangsan City F, the Defendant manufactured and sold fake petroleum products in a manner that sells petroleum products with 15% oil, such as diesel products, as fuel, and sells them by supplying them at the site of “G National Highway Construction Works”. (2) On May 18, 2017, the Defendant sold fake petroleum products as fuel to H JBdodododododododododododododododododododododododododododo, K if, and D if, around May 18, 2017, the Defendant sold them as fuel, and the Defendant manufactured and sold a mixture of petroleum products with 5% oil (117 liter) such as 30% petroleum products, and (3) around May 18, 2017, the Defendant sold them to the expressway 10% 30% of the mixture of petroleum products, such as 10% Cydo.

B. A, an employee of the Defendant Company, committed an act in violation of the above paragraph (a) with respect to the duties of the Defendant Company.

2. Claims and legal principles by the Defendants

A. The summary of the Defendants’ assertion asserts that the Defendants do not have a limited liability for fake petroleum products which combine the transit and fluor oil into the I T (H), J (JBdodododoer, KJ-dong, and N (hereinafter referred to as “instant heavy machine”) at the time and place indicated in the facts charged.

B. The finding of guilt in a criminal trial ought to be based on evidence of probative value, which could lead a judge to have a conviction that is not likely to have a reasonable doubt, to the extent that the facts charged are true, and, if there is no such proof, there is a suspicion of guilt against the defendant.