1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for 10 months, and by a fine of 2,00,000 won, respectively.

2. Defendant B is the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is in charge of the overall management of Friju-gun E in the Jeon Chang-gun, and Defendant B is an employee of the above gas station and manages the gas station.

1. The Defendants’ co-principal

A. Defendants in violation of the Petroleum and Petroleum Substitute Fuel Business Act conspired to sell fake petroleum products mixed with light oil and oil. On May 14, 2015, around May 14, 2015, at the construction site of the instant oil station, the Defendants sold fake transit by selling approximately 15% of the combined fake oil per liter by selling approximately 2,090 litres per 1,390 litres, when they sold a total of 15% of the instant petroleum products, such as light oil for automobiles, through the construction site of the instant oil station at the construction site of the instant oil station at the site of the instant oil station.

B. The Defendants conspired to commit fraud to the first place.

At the time and place of port, as mentioned above, 2,090 liters transit 2,09 litres as if it were a normal product, and 1,390 won per liter were sold to the victim chip construction. In order to obtain 2,905,100 won from the victim, the Institute attempted to obtain 2,905,100 won from the victim, but it was discovered that it was a fake transit through the quality inspection conducted by the former North Korean headquarters.

2. Defendant A: (a) around 11:20 on May 14, 2015, Defendant A.

In the vicinity of the construction site mentioned in the port, the employees of the former North Korea Institute, who are victims, collected samples for the purpose of quality inspection of petroleum from the G alcoholic beverages in the said station, and found that the said employees kept four copies of samples in the H Spart space where the said employees were on board the said employees, and that the said employees collected the additional samples, which led to the theft of four samples in the aggregate of the market prices of the victims located in the said Spart space and obstructing the quality inspection of the victims at the same time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Part I and J of the suspect interrogation protocol against Defendant B.