logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.06.11 2019누68314
감봉처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the judgment, is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of

【The part to be removed or added” between the last 6th 6th 6th 7th 1st 6th 1st 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 1st 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 7th 7th 7th 7th 4th 4th 4th 4th 6th “the Plaintiff is difficult to deem the Plaintiff to have a duty to shoulder the Plaintiff who was on duty at the time of the so-called cruel training that the former worker was aware that he was on duty and did not work as a result of the fact that he did not know that he was on duty and did not know that he was on duty and did not have any awareness that he was on duty in breach of his superior duty at the time of the so-called 1th 1st 3th 1st 3th 1st 1st 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 1st 1st 3th 3th.

arrow