beta
Text
1. The plaintiff among the judgment of the court of first instance, who falls under the following amount:
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. Defendant A Co., Ltd (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant A”; hereinafter referred to as “stock company”) is a company that manufactures and sells non-pharmaceutical drugs; from August 25, 2014 to October 20, 2014, B; and from October 20, 2014 to August 19, 2015, Defendant A was an internal director of Defendant A.
B. C owns two-story factories of the general steel structure of Dong 1, Dong 1, Incheon, Incheon, (hereinafter “instant manufacturing operation”), 2, Dong 2, Dong 2, and other roof 1 (hereinafter “instant warehouse”), and combined manufacturing operation and storage (hereinafter “instant factory”).
C. On January 2, 2014, Defendant A leased the instant factory from C, and around that time, Defendant A acquired all of the machinery, facilities, and finished products in the factory from B, which had engaged in the manufacturing of quasi-drugs, using the trade name of “E” at the instant factory, and manufactured fingers, insects, etc. at the instant factory.
In addition to the factory of this case, Defendant A installed an outdoor warehouse and a tent warehouse on the site of the above factory.
Defendant A stored in the warehouse of this case by subdividing and storing alcohol in order to make finished products such as fingers and insects and products. At the outdoor warehouse of the warehouse, Defendant A loaded finished products such as fishing and scambling, loaded scambling, etc., and performed an operation to scam off the number of fruit powder by installing smoke scambling, compounding, and strawing, etc. At the front end of the manufacturing operation, Defendant A stored 2 FRP containers (e.g., 950 litress), 400 litress of glycerines in excess of the permitted capacity.
On June 19, 2015, around 04:18, a fire occurred in the instant warehouse (hereinafter referred to as “instant fire”), and the instant plant was fired by fire officers dispatched, but due to which the fire was spread, damage was caused to the G-owned building, which is the neighboring building of the instant plant, and K-owned building, I, and J-owned building.
In the lower court, H building and K building are in this case.