1. The plaintiff's claims are all dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit shall include costs resulting from the participation.

1. Basic facts

A. The status and relation 1) H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “H”) between the Plaintiffs and the Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor and its officers and employees

In the following cases:

B. As seen in paragraph (2), on October 20, 2005, the Defendant’s polyethylene (Plyethyne (hereinafter “PE”), as seen in paragraph (2)

(i)Plastic goods (including pipes and pipes) made mainly of the raw material;

hereinafter referred to as “PE” of plastic products

[2] The land divided by the above I on March 12, 2008 is the land that is divided by Kimpo-si I, J, and K ( March 12, 2008

L, which is divided by the above J on March 12, 2008

(2) The part of the general steel structure 28,748 square meters above the ground of the same 28,748 square meters is the “factory of this case” and the part of the building “Da” is the “factory of this case” and the “Dong building, the general steel structure, the general steel structure, and other three roof.”

(ii) the same building(hereinafter referred to as the “Dong”) is a general steel structure or other pent roof factory.

(2) The Defendant’s Intervenor (hereinafter “Supplementary Intervenor”) (hereinafter “PVC”) is trying to engage in the manufacturing of plastic products (including pipes and pipes; hereinafter “PV plastic products”) using PVC (hereinafter “PVC”) as main ingredients in the instant plant.

3) The present location of H and auxiliary intervenors is the same as the “Gimpo City M,” on the other hand, in the case of H, N representative director, internal director, and QP are listed respectively as the auditor. In the case of an auxiliary intervenor, O is a representative director, internal director, N is an internal director, and P is listed respectively. P owns each land of H and auxiliary intervenor Kimpo-si I and K out of the site of H and auxiliary intervenor, and Kimpo-si J and L own N. 4) Meanwhile, Plaintiff A owns approximately 260 meters away from the factory of this case, and Plaintiff B owns the same.