1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the plaintiff (appointed party) who is equivalent to additional payments order is lost.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Authorization and Public Notice of Project Implementation - Housing Redevelopment Project (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”) - Project Operators: Defendant - the Busan Metropolitan City Public Notice of Maritime Daegu on November 4, 2009

B. The adjudication of expropriation by the local Land Tribunal of Busan Metropolitan City on September 8, 201 and the adjudication of objection by the Central Land Tribunal of July 20, 201 (hereinafter respectively referred to as “adjudication of expropriation”) - Land to be expropriated (hereinafter referred to as “instant land”) listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as “the instant land”) and obstacles listed in the separate sheet No. 2 of the land subject to expropriation (hereinafter referred to as “in this case”) owned by the Plaintiffs and the designated parties (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiffs, etc.”): Compensation for losses as indicated in the separate sheet No. 3: Compensation for losses as indicated in the separate sheet No. 3, and this was calculated based on the arithmetic average of the appraisal results of each appraisal corporation and one appraisal corporation.

- Commencement date of expropriation: October 20, 201

The defendant deposited all compensation according to the ruling on objection that should be paid to the plaintiffs, etc.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, Eul evidence Nos. 6, 7, 10, 11, 13, and 14 (including branch numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. 1 claims by the plaintiffs, etc. (1) The rearrangement zone designation of the project in this case was made on the basis of the proposal for designation of the rearrangement zone by the Jungman Technology Group, Inc., which omitted such contents despite the failure to meet the requirements stipulated in the laws and regulations. (2) Even though the rearrangement project cost at the time of the project implementation plan in this case considerably exceeded the project cost and construction cost obtained the consent of union members at the time of establishment, it did not obtain the consent of more than 2/3 of union members, and (3) the project in this case