1. The Defendant’s KRW 729,167,050 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from July 17, 2013 to December 8, 2015.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business approval and public notice - Business name: A project approval and public notice - A zone 1 (hereinafter referred to as “instant project”): Defendant: C public notice of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on June 28, 2007; D public notice of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on December 31, 2008; E public notice of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on April 5, 2012; F-project operator public notice of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on December 24, 2012;

(b) The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on expropriation on May 23, 2013 - The object of expropriation is as indicated in the separate sheet on the details of compensation owned by the Plaintiffs.

(hereinafter referred to as “each land of this case” and, when an individual land is referred to, only the parcel number shall be specified as “the land of this case” and the obstacles to the object of expropriation shall be deemed as the obstacles to the object of expropriation. The amount of compensation for losses shall be as indicated in the separate sheet on the compensation details.

- An appraisal corporation: An appraisal corporation on July 16, 2013 - An appraisal corporation: An appraisal corporation at sight and a national appraisal corporation;

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on an objection made on April 17, 2014 - Compensation amount: The same shall apply to the statement in the column of “amount of the said ruling”.

- Certified public appraisal corporations: Dive appraisal corporations and central appraisal corporations;

D. The result of the appraisal commission and the result of the supplementary appraisal commission with respect to the appraiser G (hereinafter “court appraiser G”), and the result of the appraisal entrustment, “court appraisal” and “court supplementation appraisal”: The content of appraisal on the premise that the court appraiser is a management area of each land of this case, such as the appraisal of judgment, shall be the amount indicated by the court appraiser in the “court appraisal” and “court appraisal amount” as to the land of this case, under the premise that the specific use area of each of the land of this case is a management area, as in the appraisal of judgment, the court appraiser shall select the land of this case 964mm2 at the time of strike, the land of this case, the J, K, and L as a comparative standard, and assess the compensation amount for each of the land of this case as to the land of this case.