beta
Text
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Basic facts (1) around July 1, 2005, Plaintiff A received written consent from Plaintiff B, Plaintiff C around October 6, 2005, Plaintiff C around January 2006, Plaintiff D around November 2005, Plaintiff E around February 5, 2006, Plaintiff F did not distinguish Plaintiff E from the G Urban Development Project Association (tentative name) and the Plaintiff’s land owner in the Defendant’s business area, and concluded a service contract (hereinafter “each service contract of this case”) with the content that: (a) Plaintiff C is urged to attend a general meeting and receive compensation from the Defendant; and (b) Plaintiff F is obligated to receive the payment from the Defendant (hereinafter “each service contract of this case”).
Article 3 of the instant service agreement provides for the following:
The payment rate of the service contract under Article 3 (Terms of Payment for Services Costs) shall be paid differently with each service operator according to the degree of performance of each individual service within the limit of KRW 1,188,600,000 (0.9% of the appraised value of land within the project area) determined at the cost of the G Urban Development Project within the limit of KRW 1,188,60,000 (0.9% of the appraised value of land within the project area) within the scope of the 3rd budget for the designation/approval of the development plan for a certain area within the scope of the 2nd budget.
(Proportional distribution amount according to service performance among the total budget): Provided, That if necessary, the defendant may preferentially pay a certain fee within budgetary limits according to the contractor's circumstances.
② Under each service contract of this case, the Plaintiffs were required to receive written consent from the landowners in the Defendant’s business area.
Accordingly, the defendant, the plaintiff Eul from March 23, 2007 to September 12, 2008, the plaintiff Eul from August 13, 2004 to September 12, 2008, the plaintiff Eul from August 13, 2004 to September 12, 2008, the plaintiff Eul shall be 43,368,000 won from June 27, 2006 to September 12, 2008, and the plaintiff Eul shall be 56,868,00 won from April 20, 2006 to September 20, 2008, and the plaintiff Eul shall be 56,868,000 won from June 27, 2006 to September 27, 2008.