1. The Plaintiff, Defendant B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, and L are jointly and severally liable for 375,735,060 won, and the said Defendants and the Defendant jointly and severally.

Basic Facts

Plaintiff

Mutual Liability Company prior to the change

P. On January 13, 2006, the trade name of March 3, 2006 was changed to the Plaintiff, and entered into an administrative agency service contract relating to Qua housing reconstruction and rearrangement projects (tentatively named R, the secretary general L) and the Seoul Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Council. On March 28, 2008, the Plaintiff entered into a revised (tentatively named) TT reconstruction/Redevelopment/maintenance Promotion Committee (U. and the defendant of the secretary general) with respect to the said union.

L. The promotion committee of this case (hereinafter referred to as “instant promotion committee”).

) T reconstruction/Redevelopment/maintenance/Maintenance Project (hereinafter referred to as the “instant Project”) to be undertaken in the Seoul Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City S.

(2) The administrative agency service contract was concluded again (hereinafter “instant contract” in total with the administrative agency service contract concluded earlier)

A) The contents of the instant contract are as follows. The instant promotion committee provides the Plaintiff with service duties and the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents following the implementation of a reconstruction project (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”).

(1) The scope of service duties is limited to the scope of service duties under each subparagraph of Article 69 (Article 1). The scope of service duties is the business affairs of the association (Article 2), approval of the promotion committee and approval of the modification plan, the establishment of project implementation plan and approval of the modification plan, the establishment and approval of the modification plan, the completion approval, the transfer notification, and the liquidation business (Article 2). The criteria and methods for the payment of service costs for the rearrangement project to the Plaintiff are as follows (Article 3). (Omission) As a result of the review of the data related to the establishment of the second reconstruction master plan provided by the promotion committee of this case, the Plaintiff’s prior support for the expenses related to the designation and implementation of the zone under the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents, and the pre-paid support to the promotion committee of this case.