1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. According to the Urban Development Act, the Defendant is entitled to the instant project area: (a) KRW 175,931 square meters (al.e., approximately 53,219 square meters); and (b) the Defendant is entitled to the instant project area in accordance with the Urban Development Act.

(B) An urban development project of B district (hereinafter “instant urban development project”)

2) The Plaintiff is a person who served as the representative director from November 13, 2006 to October 6, 2008, from E Co., Ltd. (E was changed from November 3, 2008 to F Co., Ltd. (E was changed from November 3, 2008 to F Co., Ltd.) that entered into a contract for the promotion of the instant urban development project and the execution of the construction works with the Defendant.

B. (1) (tentatively referred to as the Defendant’s establishment process) G District Consolidation and Rearrangement Project Association (hereinafter “G District Project Association”).

Since around 1993, it shall be the compartmentalization and rearrangement project on the land of approximately 90,00 square meters (hereinafter referred to as the “instant rearrangement project”) including the land within the instant project zone.

2) Around 2000, G District Business Association had been established by the owners of the above land to promote the instant urban development project in the instant project zone instead of the instant compartmentalization and rearrangement project, and was changed to B District Urban Development Project Promotion Committee (hereinafter “instant Promotion Committee”).

3. The promotion committee of this case holds an inaugural general meeting on September 9, 2007 and obtains authorization for the establishment from the Pohang-si on March 20, 208, and the same year.

4. 23. The establishment of the Defendant Union was established upon the completion of the registration of incorporation.

C. (1) On February 20, 1993, the G District Business Association concluded an implementation contract on the implementation project within the instant business zone, and only H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “H”) whose representative director was the Plaintiff on February 20, 1993

If a division and a G District Business Association constitute an association necessary for the authorization of the instant compartmentalization and rearrangement project, prepares a written consent of its members, and delegates the implementation of the said project to H, H shall obtain design authorization and all administrative procedures necessary for the said compartmentalization and rearrangement project.