logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.11.26 2014고단8225
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud;

A. On May 18, 2014, around 04:30 on May 18, 2014, the Defendant, even though there was no intention or ability to pay the drinking value from the main point of “E” for the operation of the victim D located in the Busan Y-gu, Busan Y-gu, the Defendant was provided with and acquired the drinking value by ordering the victim to pay the drinking value as a total of KRW 19,000.

B. On October 4, 2014, around 00:05, the Defendant, despite having no intention or ability to pay the drinking value from the main point of “H” in the operation of the victim G located in the Geum-gu, Busan, the Defendant was provided with a total of KRW 300,000 with the text of the alcohol and the notes that the victim would incur.

C. On October 4, 2014, around 03:00, the Defendant, despite having no intention or ability to pay the drinking value at the main point of the “K” in the operation of the FJ of the FJ of the Busan Geum-gu, the Defendant was provided with the victim with an order of 300,000 won in total and 300,000 won, and acquired the drinking value.

2. Interference with business;

A. While drinking alcohol at the time and place of Paragraph A of the above Article 1, the Defendant 1, while drinking alcohol at the above place, saw the Defendant’s bath to the employees of the above main shop, and interfered with the victim’s bar business by force by avoiding disturbance for about 30 minutes, such as spiting spits on the floor.

B. The Defendant, at the time and place of Paragraph 1-b above, obstructed the victim’s bar business by force by driving a disturbance for about 30 minutes, such as pressing a vision, cutting off the table, and destroying the glass, on the grounds that the said victim would change his/her drinking value in calculating his/her drinking value.

C. The Defendant, at the time and place of the foregoing Paragraph 1(c) stated that, on the grounds that the said victim would have changed the drinking value at a time and place, he saw as follows: “I do not have to go against the law as to whether she is fluor, spule, female spule, and spule, and not having to go against the victim’s body.”

arrow