A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 11, 2015, the Defendant, at around 23:50 on October 11, 2015, issued an order of alcohol and alcohol as if he would have paid the price to the victim although he did not have any intent or ability to pay the drinking value because the fact at the main point of “E” operated by the victim D, located on the 1st underground floor in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sung-gu, Seoul, as of October 11, 2015. The Defendant was provided with alcohol and alcohol equivalent to 68,000 won at the market price from the damaged person.

2. On October 12, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 23:50 on October 12, 2015, committed a crime in the “H dan” operated by the Victim G located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si, which was the Defendant: (b) committed the act as if he would have paid the price to the victim although he had no intention or ability to pay the alcohol value because of the lack of money; (c) ordered the Defendant to pay the said price; and (d) obtained the alcohol and the alcohol equivalent to KRW 96,00 at the market price from the damaged person.

3. On November 5, 2015, the Defendant, at around 23:45 on November 5, 2015, committed the crime in the “K Hoe House” operated by the Victim J in Seongbuk-gu, Sung-gu, Sung-gu, Sung-gu, Sung-gu, Sung-gu, Seoul, by the Defendant: (a) committed the act as if he would pay the price to the victim although he did not have any intent or ability to pay the drinking value; (b) ordered the payment to the victim; and (c) obtained the payment of the price from the damaged person with an alcoholic beverage amounting to KRW 100,00 at the market price.

4. On November 16, 2015, the Defendant: (a) boarded an O taxi operated by the victim N on the front side of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government L L L on November 16, 2015; (b) made a false statement as if the Defendant would have to pay the taxi expenses and pay the taxi expenses to the victim even though he did not have any money at the time; and (c) made a false statement as if he would have to pay the taxi expenses to the victim even though he did not have any intent or ability to pay the taxi expenses even if he did not have any money; and (d) made the victim transport the Defendant to the front day of the 13,280 won of the price to the middle-gu Seoul Metropolitan City P, Sungnam-gu, Seoul; and (b) obtained the pecuniary benefits that the victim would be exempted from paying the taxi expenses to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's person;