A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 16, 2016, the Defendant was driving a Eoper car under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.093% in the blood alcohol concentration of 0.093% in front of the front of the front day of the front day of the front day of the apartment apartment of the front day of the front day of the front day of the front day of the front day of the city of the front day of the city of the front day of the city of the city of the front day of the city of the apartment of the front day of the city of the city of the front day of the city of the city of the city of the front day of the 23:45 on August 23:45.

2. At the time and place set forth in paragraph 1, the Defendant forged the signature of the company and signed the above investigation, and when the Defendant controlled the Defendant’s pro-Japanese job offer H’s name and resident registration number to G by drinking by the F details G of the Busan Police Station in front of the State.

In the end of the police, G prepared the “Notification of the Results of Drinking Driving Control” by inputting the address, resident registration number, etc. of H during the end of the police PDA, and presented the device to the Defendant, and signed the electronic signature “H” on the back of the H’s name as he/she was, and had G transmit it to the police computer network.

Accordingly, the defendant forged and exercised his signature in H's name for the purpose of exercising his right.

3. At the time and place specified in paragraph 1, the Defendant presented the “H’s resident registration number, date and place of detection, drinking measuring process, drinking circumstances, etc.” written by G based on the Defendant’s statement. The Defendant stated the “H” as a written instrument in the vehicle’s confirmation column, and issued the document as if he/she was a genuine document to G during which he/she knew of the forgery.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged and held a copy of “the State driver’s circumstantial statement report” under the H’s name, which is a private document on proof of facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Notification of the results of regulating the driving of drinking alcohol and statement in the circumstances of the driver of drinking alcohol;

1. The appearance, uniform, language, or language of a drinking driver;