logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.11.10 2016고정1449
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2016 High Court 1449"

1. On October 4, 2015, at around 03:00, the Defendant interfered with business: (a) the victim D in Gwangju Mine-gu (“E”), operated by the victim D in Gwangju Mine-gu; (b) as a result of the demonstration, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force for about 30 minutes by avoiding a disturbance, such as: (c) the Defendant committed a disturbance, i.e., that “abbbbbbbb f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. 8

"2016 High Court 1450"

2. On October 26, 2015, at around 01:10, the Defendant acquired economic benefits equivalent to the amount of 80,500 won on the ground that the Defendant did not pay an alcoholic beverage equivalent to the amount of KRW 80,50 on his/her own cryp to cryp, such as he/she takes away from the cooling house of “H” in Gwangju Mine-gu, and did not pay an alcoholic beverage equivalent to the amount of KRW 80,50,000 on the ground that he/she did not pay an alcoholic beverage to the victim I (the 48 years of age) who is the owner of the business within the liquor of “H” in Gwangju Mine-gu.

3. On October 25, 2015, the Defendant interfered with business: (a) around 23:30 on October 25, 2015, the Defendant: (b) had the victim L (at 44 years of age) who is the owner of the business in the G of Gwangju Mine-gu, and had the victim interfered with the victim’s heading business by avoiding disturbance for about one hour, such as cutting the table table, table, fold, etc. onto the floor, without any justifiable reason.

4. The Defendant destroyed and damaged property at the same time and place as that set forth in paragraph 3, thereby damaging two fire extinguishings that were set at the same place.

5. The Defendant, on the ground that the Victim N (Nam, 57 years old), who was under contact with the business owner L at the same time and place as that of paragraph 3, was found to be “in the house”, committed assault against the victim’s bucks by leaving the victim’s face face at one time by hand, and by raising the suspect at one place.

arrow