logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2019.06.20 2019나676
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3. Judgment of the court of first instance is delivered with Paragraph (1).

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of this court is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, and such reasoning is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

(1) The grounds for appeal by the Defendant are not significantly different from the allegations in the first instance court, and the fact-finding and decision in the first instance court is justifiable even if the evidence duly adopted and examined by the first instance court shows Eul evidence No. 13, which was submitted by the Defendant to this court, and there is no error as alleged by the Defendant as the grounds for appeal. The Defendant’s appeal is dismissed in entirety as it is without merit. The Defendant’s appeal is dismissed as it is clearly without merit, and the “transaction on August 9, 2017” in the disposition of the first instance court is a clerical error in the “Sale on June 9, 2017,” and it is so decided as per

arrow