logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.04.08 2019나316784
소유권이전등기청구의소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3. Paragraph 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance is applicable.

Reasons

1. The defendant's grounds for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the argument in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified even if each evidence submitted to the court of first instance was presented to this court.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance.

2. The plaintiff's claim should be accepted on the grounds of conclusion and ex officio revision.

As the judgment of the court of first instance that shares the same conclusion is justifiable, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. Since it is clear that " August 29, 200" in the disposition of the court of first instance is a clerical error in the " August 30, 200" in the disposition of the court of first instance, it is decided to correct it. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow