logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2013.10.16 2013고단1953
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(상습폭행)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 28, 2002, the Defendant was punished by a fine of one million won for obstruction of performance of official duties at the Seoul Eastern District Court on September 27, 2005, by a fine of five hundred thousand won for damage to public goods at the Seoul East Eastern District Court on August 1, 2008, by a fine of five hundred thousand won for the crime of injury at the Seoul East Eastern District Court on March 9, 201, by a fine of one million won for the crime of injury at the Seoul East East East East Eastern District Court on August 18, 201, by a fine of five hundred thousand won for the crime of damage to property at the Seoul East Eastern District Court on June 19, 201, by a fine of one million won from the Seoul East Eastern District Court on June 19, 201, by a fine of one million won from the Seoul East Eastern District Court on July 19, 2012, to a fine of one million won from the Seoul Eastern District Court on July 27, 13 million.

On August 20, 2013, from around 20:00 to around 05:10 the following day, the Defendant had a good-quality appraisal of the victim D (Woo, 35 years of age) at the house of Seongdong-gu Seoul Seongdong-gu Seoul underground 1st century for the reason that the victim did not come to the other male, and had a common emotional dispute, and had the victim's face, face, distribution, etc. as drinking and shot, and caused the damage to the victim by drinking and shoting the victim out of the house.

The Defendant habitually assaulted the victim as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Previous records of judgment: A inquiry report and investigation report (report attached to a judgment) including criminal records;

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the records of each crime, frequency of crimes, and continuous repeated acts of violence, etc. as indicated in the judgment;

1. Article 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. The defendant was punished several times for the same type of crime in the reason of sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation.

arrow